三星 Galaxy A5 (2017) 智能手机简短评测防水。 Galaxy A5系列现在进入了第三回合，它需要和强劲的中端竞争机型相对抗。更强的性能，更大的存储空间和防水防尘都可能会成为它的杀手锏。我们将通过测试看看这是否足够帮助它取得先机。Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/21/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇷🇺 🇳🇱 🇪🇸 🇭🇺 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 Android ARM Touchscreen
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Galaxy Series)ProcessorSamsung Exynos 7880 8 x 1.9 GHz, A53Graphics adapterARM Mali-T830 MP3Memory3 GB , LPDDR3Display5.20 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, 电容式, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yesStorage32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB , 20.5 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器，近距感应器，位置和重力感应器，数字指南针，气压计, Wi-Fi Direct, Ant+Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz 和 AWS), LTE Cat. 7 (FDD: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28; TDD: 38, 40, 41), LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 146.1 x 71.4Battery3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 16 hOperating SystemAndroid 6.0 MarshmallowCameraPrimary Camera: 16 MPix (f/1.9, 27mm, 自动对焦, LED 闪光灯, 全高清视频拍摄)Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/1.9, 1080p 视频拍摄)Additional featuresSpeakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，数据线，耳机，快速开始说明, 三星应用, 微软应用, Facebook, 24 Months Warranty, USB-C, nano-SIM, IP 68 (防水防尘), 快速充电, 电磁辐射: 0.522W/kg (头部), 1.390W/kg (身体), fanlessWeight159 g, Power Supply: 62 g
Price429 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size Comparison
Lenovo Moto Z Play OnePlus 3T ZTE Axon 7 Huawei Nova Plus Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Honor 8 Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 DIN A6 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12OnePlus 3TAdreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s +87%Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s Lenovo Moto Z PlayAdreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -33%Huawei Nova PlusAdreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s -69% iperf3 receive AX12OnePlus 3TAdreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s +20%Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s Lenovo Moto Z PlayAdreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s -43%Huawei Nova PlusAdreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s -75%
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A5 (2017)Huawei Nova PlusLenovo P2Apple iPhone 7 Plus0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A5 (2017)Huawei Nova PlusLenovo P2Apple iPhone 7 Plus0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A5 (2017)Huawei Nova PlusLenovo P2Apple iPhone 7 Plus0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
567cd/m²542cd/m²530cd/m²549cd/m²539cd/m²525cd/m²548cd/m²552cd/m²527cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 567 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 542.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %Center on Battery: 660 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}Gamma: 2.28CCT: 6422 K
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"Samsung Galaxy A5 2016Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"Huawei Nova PlusIPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"ZTE Axon 7AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"OnePlus 3TOptic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"Lenovo Moto Z PlayAMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"Honor 8IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"Screen-21%-102%-137%-206%-34%-150%Brightness middle539378 -30%485 -10%328 -39%421 -22%509 -6%451 -16%Brightness542380 -30%481 -11%334 -38%430 -21%511 -6%443 -18%Brightness Distribution9391 -2%90 -3%88 -5%84 -10%93 0%93 0%Black Level *0.50.4Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.61.95 -22%4.2 -163%4.6 -188%7.1 -344%2.2 -38%5.4 -238%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.63.09 -19%7.9 -204%14.7 -465%15.3 -488%5.8 -123%9.9 -281%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.51.86 -24%4.8 -220%2.8 -87%6.8 -353%2 -33%6.7 -347%Gamma2.28 96%2.13 103%2.36 93%2.29 96%2.23 99%2.25 98%2.33 94%CCT6422 101%6376 102%7568 86%6612 98%7866 83%6768 96%8262 79%Contrast9701128* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 HzThe display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise↘ 1.6 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise↘ 1.6 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).
AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 4.0 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points -31%Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points +7%Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points +1%Honor 8
94671 Points +56%ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points +102%OnePlus 3T
159866 Points +164%Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
775 Points Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points +9%Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points +3%Honor 8
1726 Points +123%ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points +65%OnePlus 3T
1881 Points +143% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4098 Points Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points -23%Lenovo Moto Z Play
2525 Points -38%Honor 8
5481 Points +34%ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points -6%OnePlus 3T
4236 Points +3%3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points -40%Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points +5%Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points +5%Honor 8
20235 Points +53%ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points +76%OnePlus 3T
30810 Points +132%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points -43%Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points +1%Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points +1%Honor 8
22157 Points +66%ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points +83%OnePlus 3T
34494 Points +159%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points -27%Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points +21%Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points +22%Honor 8
15531 Points +19%ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points +56%OnePlus 3T
22426 Points +72%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points -71%Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points -27%Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points -28%Honor 8
1273 Points +10%ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points +134%OnePlus 3T
2577 Points +123%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points -74%Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points -30%Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points -31%Honor 8
1112 Points +6%ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points +339%OnePlus 3T
3310 Points +214%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points -16%Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points +2%Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points -7%Honor 8
2587 Points +48%ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points -37%OnePlus 3T
1452 Points -17%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points Huawei Nova Plus
465 Points -43%Lenovo Moto Z Play
461 Points -44%Honor 8
961 Points +18%ZTE Axon 7
2500 Points +206%OnePlus 3T
2221 Points +172%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points Huawei Nova Plus
384 Points -46%Lenovo Moto Z Play
382 Points -46%Honor 8
818 Points +15%ZTE Axon 7
2528 Points +256%OnePlus 3T
2418 Points +241%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points Huawei Nova Plus
1773 Points +4%Lenovo Moto Z Play
1636 Points -4%Honor 8
2482 Points +45%ZTE Axon 7
1783 Points +4%OnePlus 3T
1728 Points +1%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -58%Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps -30%Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps -30%Honor 8
43 fps +30%ZTE Axon 7
53 fps +61%OnePlus 3T
59 fps +79%1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -59%Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps -32%Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps -32%Honor 8
41 fps +21%ZTE Axon 7
88 fps +159%OnePlus 3T
91 fps +168%GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -75%Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps -33%Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps -33%Honor 8
19 fps +27%ZTE Axon 7
28 fps +87%OnePlus 3T
45 fps +200%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -75%Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps -34%Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps -33%Honor 8
19 fps +27%ZTE Axon 7
39 fps +160%OnePlus 3T
46 fps +207%GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps -27%Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps -26%Honor 8
11 fps +22%ZTE Axon 7
16 fps +78%OnePlus 3T
32 fps +256%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps -32%Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps -32%Honor 8
10 fps +10%ZTE Axon 7
31 fps +241%OnePlus 3T
32 fps +252%PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points -20%Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points +14%Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points +34%Honor 8
6735 Points +34%ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points -1%OnePlus 3T
5664 Points +12%BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points -42%Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points -10%Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points -28%Honor 8
2034 Points +44%ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points +54%OnePlus 3T
2218 Points +58% System (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points -17%Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points -18%Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points -20%Honor 8
3952 Points +52%ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points +28%OnePlus 3T
3130 Points +21% Memory (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points -63%Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points +3%Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points -47%Honor 8
2556 Points +69%ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points -1%OnePlus 3T
1954 Points +30% Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points -68%Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points -34%Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points -34%Honor 8
1703 Points +11%ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points +203%OnePlus 3T
4444 Points +191% Web (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points +12%Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points +14%Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points -2%Honor 8
994 Points +51%ZTE Axon 7
963 Points +46%OnePlus 3T
891 Points +35%Legend
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
89 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
64 Points -28%Huawei Nova Plus
83 Points -7%Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points -7%Honor 8
138 Points +55%ZTE Axon 7
111 Points +25%OnePlus 3T
135 Points +52%JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
32.22 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22 Points -32%Huawei Nova Plus
31.3 Points -3%Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points -1%Honor 8
64 Points +99%ZTE Axon 7
44.75 Points +39%OnePlus 3T
54.5 Points +69%Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5256 Points Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3611 Points -31%Huawei Nova Plus
4730 Points -10%Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points -5%Honor 8
10692 Points +103%ZTE Axon 7
8062 Points +53%OnePlus 3T
9798 Points +86%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
6442 ms * Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11887 ms * -85%Huawei Nova Plus
8028 ms * -25%Lenovo Moto Z Play
8169 ms * -27%Honor 8
2979 ms * +54%ZTE Axon 7
3097 ms * +52%OnePlus 3T
2719 ms * +58%* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Samsung Galaxy A5 2016Huawei Nova PlusLenovo Moto Z PlayHonor 8ZTE Axon 7OnePlus 3TAndroBench 3-5-3%27%63%36%115%305% Sequential Read 256KB182209.4 15%241.6 33%254.8 40%247.5 36%406.5 123%436.4 140% Sequential Write 256KB77.160.4 -22%82.1 6%73.1 -5%119.3 55%150.9 96%165.3 114% Random Read 4KB22.4122.9 2%35.64 59%38.78 73%34.16 52%121.1 440%123.6 452% Random Write 4KB12.1311.2 -8%30.12 148%45.58 276%31.5 160%16.22 34%74.4 513% Sequential Read 256KB SDCard73.741.64 -44%74.6 1%53.7 -27%78.4 6% Sequential Write 256KB SDCard5633.32 -40%50.6 -10%23.59 -58%51.3 -8%
Asphalt 8: Airborne SettingsValue high29 fps very low30 fps
... in comparison
Dead Trigger 2 SettingsValue high30 fps
Max. LoadIdle
32.5 °C32.2 °C31.2 °C 33.3 °C33 °C32.9 °C 33.4 °C33.3 °C32.7 °C
Maximum: 33.4 °CAverage: 32.7 °C
30.3 °C31.2 °C31.5 °C30.7 °C33 °C32.5 °C29.3 °C33.5 °C34 °C
Maximum: 34 °CAverage: 31.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 30 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
30.9 °C31 °C30.6 °C 31.6 °C31.6 °C30.8 °C 31.8 °C31.3 °C30.7 °C
Maximum: 31.8 °CAverage: 31.1 °C
29.1 °C29.5 °C30 °C29.2 °C29.6 °C30.2 °C28.5 °C29.9 °C30.5 °C
Maximum: 30.5 °CAverage: 29.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 29.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 25% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z Play audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0 / 0.14 WattIdle 0.64 / 1.36 / 1.4 Watt
Load
2.53 / 3.63 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A5 20173000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A5 20162900 mAhHuawei Nova Plus3340 mAhLenovo Moto Z Play3510 mAhHonor 83000 mAhZTE Axon 73250 mAhOnePlus 3T3400 mAhPower Consumption-30%-16%23%-53%-50%-84%Idle Minimum *0.640.96 -50%0.49 23%0.51 20%0.78 -22%0.64 -0%0.61 5%Idle Average *1.361.64 -21%1.63 -20%0.87 36%1.89 -39%0.84 38%1.77 -30%Idle Maximum *1.41.71 -22%1.76 -26%0.9 36%2.02 -44%0.87 38%1.81 -29%Load Average *2.532.98 -18%2.98 -18%1.69 33%5.28 -109%6.02 -138%6.67 -164%Load Maximum *3.635.08 -40%4.99 -37%4 -10%5.44 -50%10.45 -188%10.98 -202%* ... smaller is better
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
681 min Huawei Mate 9
677 min -1%Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
473 min -31%Samsung Galaxy S7
371 min -46%
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 18min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 47min
Samsung Galaxy A5 20173000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A5 20162900 mAhHuawei Nova Plus3340 mAhLenovo Moto Z Play3510 mAhHonor 83000 mAhZTE Axon 73250 mAhOnePlus 3T3400 mAhBattery Runtime-15%-17%16%-43%-39%-35%Reader / Idle24182323 -4%2048 -15%2540 5%1487 -39%1735 -28%1423 -41%H.264984672 -32%732 -26%1190 21%526 -47%704 -28%810 -18%WiFi v1.3843626 -26%820 -3%824 -2%499 -41%411 -51%494 -41%Load467483 3%366 -22%652 40%255 -45%245 -48%282 -40%
Pros+ 出色的屏幕
+ 雅致的设计
+ 超长电池续航
+ 防水防尘（IP68认证）
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 丰富的网络制式支持
+ USB-C
+ 快速处理器Cons- 不支持USB-OTG
- 仅支持USB 2.0
- 对身体的电磁辐射稍高
- 屏幕采用闪烁亮度控制
- eMMC闪存速度较慢
In review: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (SM-A520F). Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de2017年的最新三星Galaxy A5 (SM-A520F)相比竞争机型丝毫不落下风——这家韩国生产商带来了一台非常优秀的智能手机。它的设计十分成功，而电池续航也很让人满意。尽管在性能水平上无法创造新纪录，不过相比其他同类产品也毫不逊色。只是它的Grace用户界面无法在所有情况下都流畅运行，不过相比前代的TouchWiz已经有所改善。它的相机尽管让我们在视频拍摄功能上略有遗憾，但照片的拍摄效果还十分不错。防尘防水的功能，与其他三星高端设备一样，在同类产品中几乎是独一无二。它的屏幕也非常绚丽。不过，对屏幕闪烁比较敏感的用户可能需要在选择这台智能手机前谨慎考虑。
三星在前代Galaxy A5的基础上做出了不小的改进，它的出色电池续航特别让我们惊喜。
Galaxy A5 (2017)没有任何严重缺陷，不过在一些小细节如较慢的闪存，缺少对OTG和双SIM卡的支持等可能会影响一些用户的最终选择。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
- 02/07/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis92%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device91%
Connectivity47 / 60 → 79%
Weight92%
Battery97%
Display92%
Games Performance41 / 63 → 65%
Application Performance50 / 70 → 71%
Temperature92%
Noise100%
Audio58 / 91 → 64%
Camera71%
Average76%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
Please share our article, every link counts!